This store requires javascript to be enabled for some features to work correctly.

Man holding a phone with 'EVO' branding outdoors
Person holding a black bag with a red portable in pocket, wearing blue overalls.
Pyramid-shaped device with gold top and black base on a wooden surface
EMF PROTECTION  - Photo of Phi Series Bundle Pack with one Phi 03, one Phi 02 Plugin, and one Phi 01 Portable

New to Blushield?

Start Here

Blushield EMF Protection Study Results

Featured Testimonials

Latest Articles

Call to Action: U.S. Government Investigates RF Radiation, Invites Your Comments

Call to Action: U.S. Government Investigates RF Radiation, Invites Your Comments

A new HHS Request for Information is inviting public input on electromagnetic fields (EMFs), RF radiation, and wireless exposure through...

If Phones Are ‘Safe,’ Why Do They Tell You to Keep Your Distance?

If Phones Are ‘Safe,’ Why Do They Tell You to Keep Your Distance?

Phones are labeled “safe” largely because they meet regulatory limits based on outdated testing assumptions, yet manufacturers still advise keeping...

Active vs. Passive EMF Protection: Can a Non-Powered Device Truly Impact an Entire Room?

Active vs. Passive EMF Protection: Can a Non-Powered Device Truly Impact an Entire Room?

Passive EMF protection products without their own power cannot establish a dominant, coherent signal across a whole room because they...

Call to Action: U.S. Government Investigates RF Radiation, Invites Your Comments

Call to Action: U.S. Government Investigates RF Radiation, Invites Your Comments

A new HHS Request for Information is inviting public input on electromagnetic fields (EMFs), RF radiation, and wireless exposure through October 21, 2026. After EMFs received only brief coverage in the 2025 MAHA Report, this focused federal notice offers an important opportunity for researchers, clinicians, advocates, and individuals to share evidence and personal experiences of EMF-related health effects. Add your voice through the Federal Register and help advance informed public-health action on unnecessary EMF exposure.

If Phones Are ‘Safe,’ Why Do They Tell You to Keep Your Distance?

If Phones Are ‘Safe,’ Why Do They Tell You to Keep Your Distance?

Phones are labeled “safe” largely because they meet regulatory limits based on outdated testing assumptions, yet manufacturers still advise keeping distance because those tests don’t reflect real-life use, like carrying a phone in a pocket or against your skin. Since RF radiation drops off quickly with even small amounts of space, that distance matters more than most people realize. The guidance suggests an underlying contradiction: if direct contact truly posed no concern, there’d be no need for separation in the first place, especially given that phones emit radiation continuously, not just during active use.

Active vs. Passive EMF Protection: Can a Non-Powered Device Truly Impact an Entire Room?

Active vs. Passive EMF Protection: Can a Non-Powered Device Truly Impact an Entire Room?

Passive EMF protection products without their own power cannot establish a dominant, coherent signal across a whole room because they lack an internal power source, timing control, and the ability to maintain a structured reference signal independent of the constantly changing ambient electromagnetic environment; instead they only interact locally in the near field, whereas powered, dynamic signaling systems can emit a consistent reference that biology can respond to more reliably.